

The controversy surrounding the death of 27-year-old Tatul Petrosyan, the husband of Armenian blogger Milena Petrosyan, has intensified following the publication of an audio recording by his sister, Narine.
According to the Armenian newspaper Hraparak, Narine shared what she described as a voice message from her late brother after Milena publicly responded to allegations concerning her relationship with a longtime male friend.
The recording has attracted attention because it appears to contain Tatul’s account of conversations about his marriage. However, the authenticity and full context of the audio have not been independently verified.
Milena Petrosyan Rejects Allegations Surrounding Her Friendship
Before the recording was published, Milena Petrosyan addressed accusations that had circulated online following her husband’s death.
The allegations centered on her relationship with a man who had reportedly been part of the couple’s social circle for many years.
In her public statement, Milena criticized the ease with which people can make serious accusations without knowing the circumstances.
She described the repeated discussion of alleged infidelity as deeply painful and questioned whether members of her social circle should automatically be connected to the tragedy.
Milena explained that the man at the center of the allegations was a longtime friend with whom she had maintained contact for years.
She urged readers to consider the situation carefully rather than accept speculation as established fact.
Her statement did not provide independent evidence resolving the allegations, but it made clear that she disputed the narrative being circulated about her personal relationships.
Narine Publishes a Recording Attributed to Tatul
Following Milena’s remarks, Tatul’s sister Narine responded by sharing an audio message that she attributed to her brother.
According to the excerpts reported by Hraparak, the speaker described receiving a telephone call from his mother-in-law and expressed shock and distress over information he said had been discussed.
The voice in the recording claimed that two people had acknowledged being romantically involved and having feelings for one another.
The speaker also recounted a warning allegedly made by Milena’s mother about the relationship.
These statements represent claims contained in a recording attributed to Tatul. They do not, by themselves, establish that the alleged relationship occurred or that the conversations happened exactly as described.
No independent authentication of the recording or confirmation from all individuals mentioned in it was provided in the source material.
Conflicting Accounts Continue to Circulate
The latest developments highlight the differing accounts that have emerged from members of Tatul Petrosyan’s family.
Narine has previously made public allegations concerning her brother’s marriage, while Milena has challenged the accusations and criticized speculation surrounding her husband’s death.
The newly released audio has added another element to the public discussion, but significant questions remain about its context and interpretation.
The existence of conflicting statements does not establish responsibility for the tragedy.
In particular, allegations about a person’s private relationships should not be treated as a proven explanation for another person’s death.
What Is Known About Tatul Petrosyan’s Death?
Tatul Petrosyan died in Kemerovo, Russia, in early October 2026.
Media reports have described his death as a suicide near a public transport stop in the city.
Earlier reporting indicated that Russian authorities were examining the circumstances of his death.
The information available in the latest report does not include new official investigative findings or establish a verified connection between the allegations concerning his marriage and the circumstances of his death.
Family Tragedy Remains the Subject of Public Attention
The statements by Milena and Narine have generated renewed discussion on social media, where the family’s personal circumstances have been widely debated.
While the recording may provide insight into what Tatul reportedly believed or had been told, it cannot independently confirm the underlying accusations.
The case continues to raise questions about the publication of private communications, the treatment of unverified allegations and the impact of online speculation on grieving families.
For now, the claims made by the different parties remain disputed, and the newly published audio should be understood as part of an ongoing public controversy rather than definitive proof of the allegations.






